|
Plus&Minus
"A weekly column: Plus&Minus will
be published in Hindustan Times, Jaipur Live. This will
speak to the ordinary reader on contemporary economic issues in a
simple format".
Solving the City’s Transport Problems
Hindustan Times Jaipur Live, June 01, 2009 <<Archive>>
By Pradeep S Mehta Signboards
carrying two four-letter words have been dotting the city’s roads for
quite some time. They are responsible for digging up the roads and
creating some amount of discomfort to road users.
One is good news and the other
not so good. The good news is the one carrying the initials: PHED or
the Public Health Engineering Department. It is laying down pipelines
for fresh water supplies from the Bisalpur project. Jaipur badly needs
a more steady source of water supply, now that the sole source at
Ramgarh is just not capable of coping with the increasing demand.
The other: BRTS is not such
good news, because it is a project to create dedicated lanes for buses
on major arterial roads. It is not good news because of several
reasons. One is that the traffic culture in Jaipur is so bad that it
will only lead to more chaos.
The other reason is that the
existing roads in more than half the stretch are already so narrow
that the balance of the road will have to carry a mixed traffic of
slow and fast moving vehicles, jaywalkers etc who will be jostling
with others all the time.
The JDA plans to have it
functional by July, 2009. It is expected to cost Rs. 200 crores, half
of which will come from the central government.
In principle, the BRTS is a
good thing, as we have seen in Bogota, Colombia. It expands the choice
of travelers to use public transport if they are assured that they
will reach their destinations faster than their own vehicles. It will
thus be also good for the environment. Alas, what we have not
considered are the issues mentioned before.
Prof. Klaus Banse who worked
extensively on the BRTS in Bogota advised against “carbon copying” the
Bogota model.
The BRTS model has already
been implemented in New Delhi and has already been in controversy.
Terming the BRTS in the capital as a "failure", a parliamentary
committee in December 2008 has suggested that the Delhi government
scrap other five approved BRT corridors and asked other cities too to
exercise caution.
The 13-member Standing
Committee of Urban Development headed by MP, Mohammed Salim expressed
the view that a thorough scientific study of each city be should be
undertaken before implementing BRTS. However, these recommendations
have not dissuaded our governments to step back.
If one looks at either Delhi
or Jaipur or even the other eight cities where the BRTS is being
implemented, the number of motorized 2- and 4-wheeler population is
rising fast, and owners of these will hesitate to move to a BRTS mode.
Perhaps an underground metro
rail system maybe a better choice, even if it costs much more. Plans
are also being discussed to have a metro in Jaipur, and that should be
expedited. We will not have more road accidents then.
 |